200 years ago I’d say you were right

Today I am writing about the ridiculous double standard going on pertaining to the Government media complex. (CNN, Fox News, Cmsnbc, Steven Colbert, John Stewart, and that other government stooge with big glasses alleged accent and missing teeth) It has recently come to my attention that the only one minority religious group    yazidi  is actually getting media coverage and minor aide from the U.S. while the attempted genocide is happening on all religious minorities in the area between Iraq and Syria. The U.S. government under the direction of our president decided to “Aide” these distressed peoples. The U.S. military dropped 2 bombs from human controlled air vehicles on an artillery emplacement. It was effectively destroyed. The only thing “they” won’t tell you is that 1st, the artillery emplacement was previously owned by the U.S., also the reason the Kurdish peshmerga  were pushed back recently was because of ISIL’s utilizing that artillery to push the Kurdish forces back and even seize the Mosul Dam. So ISIL used our technology to out range the famed Kurdish defenders and take over the largest christian city in Iraq, Qaraqosh. So essentially it is one of those increasingly familiar story of the U.S. fighting the people they attempted to help because there is no such thing as ” a good rebel” John McCain.

At this point the Yazidi, Christians, and other religious minorities are being forced to flee for the fear of either paying the  jizya ( From the point of view of the Muslim rulers, jizya was a material proof of the non-Muslims’ acceptance of subjection to the state and its laws. In return, non-Muslim subjects are permitted to practice their faith, to enjoy a measure of communal autonomy, to be entitled to the Muslim state’s protection from outside aggression) or face penalty of death upon not converting to extreme Islam. So the U.S. sent a helicopter with aide and bombed artillery that we used to own. I equivocate our most recent actions in this area as a nation like this, if a fight is happening between two people that we inflamed with our actions with weapons we supplied and yet we sit idly by like a lone police officer at a Metal show. After all the major punches are thrown we swoop in an throw cuffs on the antagonist, after the damage is done. Now I am not saying that we should do anything about it, but if we are why are we waiting until 50,000 religious minorities, the smallest being the Yazidi, are displaced and fleeing for their lives??

 Yet no one speaks about the fact that most of the people displaced are Christians who like the Yazidi are fleeing for their lives because of what they believe in. So why is it that when you turn on major news networks, with the exclusion Fox News, (even though i hate them the worst,they had 2 stories on Christians being massacred within a day of the city being taken) that I cannot even hear about Christians being slaughtered. I am sick of the double standard. We all know that in the past the Catholic 
Church in particular did not exercise the concept of “turn the other cheek” but I would dare say that in the last 200 years that has been concurrently changed. Let us look at the extreme Islamic sector counterpart(ISIL) They have zero tolerance for anyone who is not of their faith.

SIDENOTE: I dont understand why gays come out and protest Israel… If they understood what Hamas does to homosexuals,I have to think if they have rational bone in their body,they would reconsider and condemn Hamas. So why do they march in protest??!?!?!?!?!?

So if some one asked me “Why do you support the Christians they  are just as barbaric?” 200 years ago i’d say you were right. Look at Christians nowadays and tell me if this is true. Walk into a church on sunday and see if they are talking about the systematic extermination of muslims. Hell, they wont even talk about the systematic destruction/persecution of Christians happening all over the world including the Sunni Triangle. Look up the trials of alleged heresy is Pakistan, where Sharia Law still rules. Think about the slaughter of the Armenian people and the church of smyrna, 50 million christians were chased into the desert and starved with the burning of one of the 7 world churches at the time the church of Smyrna.

I end with the point that if every “christian” turns the other cheek to the slaughter of their own people then they will not survive, especially in that area where within the last 20 years has lost over 80 percent of its Christians population. A Christian population that had previously existed there for thousands of years. There is 2 links at the bottom……. It is very gruesome slaughtering of religious minorities and is banned from “American Journalist Websites.” Its dirty, if you dont wanna see the dirty jus dont watch it. (:



 Thank you for your time


The left passing laws

There is a law in California called Laura’s Law.   Every county in California has the chance to ratify it. It was approved by San Francisco law makers late Tuesday night. The San Francisco Board of Supervisors, passed by a vote of 9-2 a measure known as Laura’s Law. The state law allows family members, police officers or mental health professionals to file petitions asking the court-mandated treatment of a mentally ill person.

If this law is given final approval in the coming weeks……. it would allow court-ordered outpatient treatment for people with chronic and or severe mental illness that is “deemed” a risk to themselves or others or who have been jailed or hospitalized more than once in the prior three years, among other conditions.

Now essentially what this means is that if you were one of these recurring offenders this is referring too that you would have to by law take whatever medicine the powers that be deem necessary for your metal condition. That’s not too say that they would be making these calls without modern medical science and government doctors/psychiatrist. I am sure they will.

the law will appoint a three-person panel to each case, which includes a forensic psychiatrist who would review the case to determine if a court-mandate is necessary.

What im more worried about.

Youre saying in LEFTWING Nancy Pelosi’s back yard they passed this??? Not the right????  The LEFT are infringing on our civil rights as americans and essentially stating that they have the power to determine whether or not you need mental/medical help after a certain amount of “incidents” and after you’ve reached THEIR limit you are subject to any cop, mental health professional, and family member can start to start the process of government mandated mental health care??????!!!! In the LEFT,  who passed this law, point of view, they know whats best for people when it comes to mental health and drugs and that is simply something i do not agree with. LEFT or RIGHT, i do not agree with this, and anyone who cares about past precedence or lives in San FransICKO should be concerned about their personal rights being infringed by the LEFT.

This reminds me of how Stalin used the process of  psychiatric incarceration do eliminate those who dis agreed with his political ideologies. Now im not saying that is what will happen. I am only saying that with the passing of this it simply opens the door for scenarios such as the one i previously mentioned.


Global Climate Change?

If this man were a LEADER he would not simply come out on a podium and talk about the MOON.  I THINK he would come out and say “Hey i think that humans are causing this to happen. I’ve read  many scientific reports by my skeptics and believers alike that can draw a very real scientific conclusion which I believe  links  human environmental interactions to “climate change”.” I THINK  he would say “Yes while I believe this to be linked to humans and a real effort should be made to reel in the U.S. impact on this, WITHOUT crippling our current coal energy systems with impossible restrictions and negatively  affecting the U.S. economy.” Anyone who speaks with ABSOLUTENESS, whether it be a  scientist or politician alike, is some one OBVIOUSLY does not grasp the concept of  science. They are clearly not ready to drop their current belief at any point in time for one that is currently FACTUALLY supported.

“nobody said the moon wasnt there. Or that it was made of cheese.” hhahahahahahhahhahaha is this Jon Stewart. Or is it just his crowd?

“there is one member in congress who even supports the idea of dinosaur flatulence….. but i wont get into that..” What is this man saying right now. He sounds like me in a courtroom. The only difference, is I stood to gain nothing by cracking jokes. Only the amusement of onlookers. This man may very well get another “Nobel Peace Prize”. I put it in quotes because I believe it to be as important as the quotes Obama said about dinosaur flatulence. Look at what this man is saying in a logical manner and the only conclusion i believe you can come to is one of utter disappointment  for lack of factual or even logical substance.

“Theyre view may be wrong…… and a fairly serious threat to everyone’s future, at least they have the brass to actually say what they think. There is some who also duck the question when asked about climate change they say (“hey im not a scientist”) and I’ll translate that for you…..” he says. ” ( I know that man made  climate change is happening but if I admit it I’ll b run out of town by our radical fringe that think climate scientist is a liberal plot”)

So let me get this straight not only is the President a renown global climate scientist but he is also a Seasoned translator.

Well I am also a seasoned translator and what i would LOVE to translate is an objective report supported by objective nonpartisan “climatologists”  that supports any and all of the claims being made by Obama and others like him.

Please someone link me, because this sounds like a drunk talking after they’ve had too much to drink. Its just comical words……….

LAST WORD https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&biw=1031&bih=875&site=imghp&tbm=isch&q=time+magazine+global+cooling&spell=1&sa=X&ei=EN2sU-TTEdikyASCpILYAg&ved=0CBsQvwUoAA#facrc=_&imgdii=KoPcwZNVAzlnLM%3A%3Bn1YLIBKJu608UM%3BKoPcwZNVAzlnLM%3A&imgrc=KoPcwZNVAzlnLM%253A%3BwG_RgP5EN7zZFM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fraymondpronk.files.wordpress.com%252F2014%252F01%252Ftime_covers.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fraymondpronk.wordpress.com%252F2014%252F01%252F06%252Frecord-low-temperatures-in-united-states-as-mother-nature-changes-weather-and-climate-to-global-cooling-the-coming-ice-age-need-nuclear-power-to-keep-warm-and-cool-videos%252F%3B640%3B360

If you look up the time magazine cover in the 70’s youll see titles like THE BIG FREEZE, twice, THE COOLING OF AMERICA, HOW TO SURVIVE THE COMING ICE AGE, In the  and 90’s 2000’s you have GLOBAL WARMING, and THE GLOBAL WARMING SURVIVAL GUIDE. Its ridiculous we as americans cannot be this blind to obvious media misdirection, and are able to somehow SEE the  factual evidence supporting these claims which  I MYSELF HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO FIND WITH MY EYES AND ALL RESOURCES I HAVE AT MY DISPOSAL. MAYBE ITS BECAUSE UNLIKE EVERYONE ELSE IM NOT USING MY MIND TO  !!!!!!FIND!!!!! THE EVIDENCE. Instead trusting facts.

This is just the beginnings of the core issues with “climate change”




The fundamental difference between someone like Jaime Dupree and someone like Bill oreily or bill Maher is that objectivity is lacking in both of the latter. Someone who can only find the problem and never the solution cannot be because they themselves don’t possess the mental acuity to distinguish such; I think it is directly relating to the general populace not wanting to hear a solution because it is not as grabbing as the problem itself.Though I hope it is not the case I strongly believe that many Americans cannot perceive such solutions to be a possibility because of “their” inability

to wade through the political redirect as it exists in the world today.

Many political leaders on both sides of the aisle understand this and use it to their advantage on a daily basis. The only solution i can come up with,

to combat such a blatant use of misinformation is too flood the channels of information with differing, factual, non-bias information.

The most difficult aspect of that particular challenge is that the controlling factors have such a market share,

(FOX, NBC, ABC, CNN) in certain aspects of media forums that

in order reach the people you want to, you have to give in certain points of your belief at least temporarily to attempt to get your message out.

The point being that you have to “sellout” to be heard.

Now I know some of you are thinking, yes well What about the internet and all the new fast ways of transmitting information that has since revolutionized

the media as we know it?

It is true that it has made it easier in the regard that cell phones, internet blogs, vine, all types of social media can make it easier to connect

with the uninformed American populace. Although often left out is the fact that information has become more readily available also means that information

that is not factual is essentially clogging the airways. So in effect people who do not understand how to navigate such an ocean of info, may

find it harder to perceive what info is actually reliable. I myself have issues with this very problem daily. The only cognitive solution I can perceive is

educating the populace on how to better navigate the media’s arena.

That brings me to my next point. How do you attempt to relay to a large group of people that the way they have been gathering information can be improved,

without skewing them into thinking your point of view.

So now we have this huge information age where allegedly past forms of media are less influential (FOX, NBC, CNN, ABC) and people

can find out almost anything they want if they have access to the internet, yet still Americans i know every day trust their information gathering to

the networks. So now you have this great tool that has never existed in history before, yet the amount of people who could use it but don’t, has never been

greater. There are a couple of reasons why I think this is happening. One major fact being that it is simply easier for someone to turn on the television

and just watch and hear what’s happenings as opposed to reading about what’s happening. I think another distinct factor is the  percentage of population

that is not “tech savvy” and simply don’t want to learn. I think many issues core problem, is the lack of a consistent thirst for knowledge.

If you do not possess the ability to understand that everything you learn about is not going to be entertaining but may very well be relevant to your life,

and your future then you need to take that step. The biggest issue that i have with media bias is the fact that many people know it is going on, yet they

continue to be a part of the media machine.

The only realistic way i think we can combat this phenomenon is through constant self evaluation of the source of the information and evaluating

yourself, making sure that other’s bias have not encroached on your own. I like to think that occasionally a news anchor here and there actually do this

but I’m constantly reminded of our society’s ability to make corruption the normal. Many other societies have far more corruption, the big difference being

we “allegedly” have the right to question our honesty and those of others, yet i feel many voices leading this questioning; whether it be questioning the

government, or your choice of friends; the  bias is focused on those entities, Ignoring the bias of those reporting. That is very real and very unchecked in

our world today. Unchecked mostly i believe to the credit of the American populace who ignorantly enjoy the pleasures of freedom without ever giving thought

to exercising them. It is an awful paradox, fed also by the machine of “social media”. I have always had a hard time understanding why so many people

can become so easily fascinated in other people lives having no ACTUAL bearing on there own. I credit some of the past power and ALL of the future power of

celebrities to their ability to harness social media in all of its forms no matter how low morally, (you) may rate them because you are still TALKING about

THEM. Bias also exists in the media in regards to movie stars, athletes, or anyone “famous”. Certain people are portrayed in a certain light as long as the

people shining that light are “cool” with them. Britney Spears for example was the golden child of America, that is until America got tired of her being

that and then the “real” britney came out. But that was just the media bias in the first place for portraying someone who never really existed in the first


For these people who are currently employed as journalist, (FOX, CNN, NBC, BILL OREILY, BILL MAHER) to name a few, i say they should never even be allowed

to report on anything but their

failure to hold themselves accountable and  for employing the bias that i believe is currently keeping them employed at their respective stations. It

is always difficult to speak out against the majority, you risk your future and your families future by doing so. So unfortunately i understand how

these aforementioned people would not dare such a thing; but that simply does not excuse them from exercising their morale’s. It is too the point where

I cannot blame the American people for being so cynical. It is a product of corruption in more than just the government and the only way to try to counter

it is attempting to look at every piece of information as transparent as possible.

For many Americans that means leaving their comfort zones or their respective news shows and breaching out in an attempt to broaden their understanding

of the world as we know it. I implore every American who reads this to do just that, you will be amazed at what you can uncover.